Notebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 15:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 62
1-Core 142
2-Core 266
83% 157 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 592
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 50.6
Parallax 9.2
7% 22.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 11
Splatting 8.8
8% 10 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1392 1043 574 604 632 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 861
Write 1382
Mixed 984
SusWrite 928
236% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 22
96% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,079
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 944
702% 936 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 161%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 18.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 14.9
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Notebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback