Acer Extensa 215-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 14:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Memory 0.86
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 131
35% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 195
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.5
3% 6.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 4.6
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA LEGEND 700 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FWV0620A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 635 479 370 640 727 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 937
Write 462
Mixed 530
SusWrite 548
138% 619 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 16.9
94% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 36.7
68% 134 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 174%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: JU002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 101 90 119 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 105
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 4.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 1.3
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 498
8% 498 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-54 Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback