Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 98.1
43% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 284
28% 230 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 47
Parallax 55.6
36% 49.1 fps
MRender 45.2
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 32.6
32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 253
Mixed 313
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 20.4
82% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 34.6
65% 127 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
894GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 111 114 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 146
Write 119
Mixed 106
SusWrite 113
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
4GB free, PID dd32
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 22.2
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback