MSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 23:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 90
47% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 258
26% 210 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 51
44% 52.9 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 51.7
44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 31TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V071
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 329 339 357 380 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 445
Write 372
Mixed 371
SusWrite 338
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 23.6
103% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 44.4
64% 118 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G45 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback