MSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 23:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 60
2-Core 108
52% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 286
28% 231 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 51.1
45% 54 fps
MRender 57.7
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 52.5
45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 31TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V071
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 342 345 372 381 379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 427
Write 356
Mixed 344
SusWrite 344
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 22.8
104% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 43.5
63% 118 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G45 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G45 (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback