HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory244.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 18:46
Run Duration451 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 98.4
43% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 406
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
HP(103C 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 129
Parallax 122
106% 127 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 129
Splatting 112
95% 116 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,390
Write 1,152
Mixed 479
222% 1,007 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 32
106% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 479
349% 458 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
26GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,444
Write 1,257
Mixed 557
240% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 32.9
111% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 588
435% 577 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
173GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1421 1432 1429 1435 1433 1433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1449
Write 1,281
Mixed 828
SusWrite 1,431
280% 1,247 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 35.2
115% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 529
386% 508 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 203%
Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
102GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 1460 1457 1459 1464 1468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,409
Write 1,288
Mixed 557
SusWrite 1,461
265% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 33
110% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 585
435% 578 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 205%
Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
171GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1444 1422 1444 1447 1446 1448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 1,296
Mixed 565
SusWrite 1,442
265% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 33.1
111% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 533
390% 512 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 202%
Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
715GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1441 1449 1438 1438 1449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,468
Write 1,271
Mixed 561
SusWrite 1,442
266% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 33.9
110% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 556
411% 545 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 205%
Great: 292%
Seagate ST6000NM0235-2AB11C 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 129 106 130 108 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
Read 113
Write 142
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 122
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
240% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 31.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 11
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback