Asus K46CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K46CM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K46CM
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime10 Days
Run DateNov 06 '17 at 09:00
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 110
55% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 164
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 100D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2761
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7
4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACJC2M128mSH 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.094.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 330
Write 11.2
Mixed 107
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 0.16
31% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.1
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 3.38
12% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 40%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
322GB free
Firmware: JF4OA200 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 100
Write 113
Mixed 31.9
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.23
76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 68%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
48GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 38
Write 30.6
Mixed 10.8
30% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.23
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K46CM Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K46CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback