Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 48.8 2-Core 82.4 39% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 48.4 13% 86.2 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 828C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 5.8 4% 4.9 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 8.1 5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 60 93 77 90 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 801 Write 78.4 Mixed 120 SusWrite 87.2 58% 271 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 14.3 54% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 92 67% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 193%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.1 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	354x
Radeon R7 M465AMDBench 7%, 29 samples	3x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	38x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	37x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	29x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	35x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	34x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 5,210 samples	26x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $50