Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '22 at 14:31
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS) 36 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Memory 10.6 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 51.6 15% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 136 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 262GB 236GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 76 78 64 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.26% Terrible	Read 53.3 Write 60.2 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 70.2 13% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.5 6% 1.8 MB/s

Qemu HARDDISK 186GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 75 78 65 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42% Average	Read 75.8 Write 50 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 69.9 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.9 317% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 398 10% 398 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16