Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 77.4 44% 69 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 384 29% 260 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 505E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 6.5 5% 8 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 0.3 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsf5512gpuk TOSHIBA 512GB 1,826 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51055KLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 171 181 118 145 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51% Above average	Read 158 Write 254 Mixed 578 SusWrite 152 65% 286 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 22.7 76% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 337 236% 291 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 163%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 512GBThnsf5512gpukBench 121%, 1,826 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	1x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9905624-007.A00G 16GBSamsungBench 69%, 42 samples	1x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 24GBHynixBench 60%, 5 samples	1x