ECS A880GM-AD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardECS A880GM-AD3  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100811
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 04:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 86.4
47% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 221
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
466GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 117 116 117 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 97.5
Write 112
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 118
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 169 133 164 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 155
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 00RUI-- 4G 1333 KINGBOX-1333 Kingston ACR16D3LFU1KBG/2G KB256082G 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880GM-AD3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A880GM-AD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback