Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 190
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 497
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.30
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 183
Parallax 204
148% 190 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 160
Splatting 133
133% 167 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 60 52 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 464
Mixed 361
SusWrite 79.1
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 46.2
152% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 230
208% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
274GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 94.2
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 10.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback