RM DESKTOP 210

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM DESKTOP 210  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I/RM/SI
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 21:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 283
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 69.3
58% 71.7 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 67.9
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 113 120 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 150
Write 119
Mixed 120
SusWrite 116
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 19.1
70% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 28.5
26% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
224GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 85 86 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 78
Write 88.6
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 85
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP 210 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: RM DESKTOP 210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback