Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '17 at 21:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 787
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 151
Parallax 128
110% 138 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 131
Splatting 110
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 981
Mixed 967
218% 972 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 34.2
178% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 49.4
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 32.9
41% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 155%
Great: 313%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 3,089
Write 1,238
Mixed 1,462
422% 1,930 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 33.4
210% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 266
266% 427 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 283%
Great: 313%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
427GB free
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 499
Mixed 490
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 20.5
131% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 20.4
32% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 30.5
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 45.5
88% 45.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback