Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 02:18
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 287
98% 176 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 804
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 151
Parallax 140
109% 142 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 130
Splatting 111
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 981
Mixed 972
217% 971 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 33.9
183% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 50.1
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 171
107% 117 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 156%
Great: 313%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
430GB free
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 487
Mixed 491
111% 499 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 21.2
140% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 20.5
109% 248 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 3,044
Write 2,174
Mixed 1,704
510% 2,307 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 32.4
216% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 36
51% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 322%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 29.5
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 34.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 44.4
90% 44.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback