Toshiba Satellite C655

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111121
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 118
53% 85 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 285
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCE0) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 54 7.3 4 3.6 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 647
Write 3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 21.1
35% 169 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Mixed 5.6
97% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 98%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 81 62 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47% Average
Read 87.7
Write 95.1
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 75.7
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C655 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback