Toshiba Satellite C655

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C655 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '22 at 17:03
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 157 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 316 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FCE0) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
P3-256 256GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 26 3.3 31 3.3 4.3 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.3% Very poor	Read 234 Write 218 Mixed 6 SusWrite 11.8 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 34% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 98%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 60GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 62 69 89 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 67.3 Write 70.2 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 71.7 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GB 5,164 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C655 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655

CPU
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	23x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	23x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	18x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	53x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	35x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 23%, 2,805 samples	20x
TSB1333D3S9SR8U/2G 1x2GBKingstonBench 41%, 129 samples	16x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16