Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 20:21
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 142
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 372
37% 300 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 89
55% 73.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 48.6
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 370 373 374 373 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 351
Write 328
Mixed 289
SusWrite 363
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 35
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 202
166% 239 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 117%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
111GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 147 146 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 423
Write 401
Mixed 257
SusWrite 174
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 37.9
118% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 145
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 108%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 161
Write 162
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 122
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 98%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
172GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 92 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 91.2
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 108%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20
Write 5.2
Mixed 2.2
8% 9.13 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R934G2130U1S 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback