TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07F3F4
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 101
52% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 151
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 50.4%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 4.5
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.92%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 261
Write 49.2
Mixed 74.5
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 14.6
52% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 53.5
53% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 90%
Seagate BUP 240GB
145GB free
Firmware: 0108
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,386
Write 17.5
Mixed 29.6
99% 478 MB/s
4K Read 108
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
167% 37.1 MB/s
SDXC 128GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.1
Write 29.2
Mixed 19.4
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 46%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.2
7% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 38.7%
 Great: 68%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

CPU
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples786x
Core i5-4310UIntelBench 49%, 14,648 samples683x
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples411x
GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples1,972x
GTX 780-TiNvidia  $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples1x
HD Graphics FamilyIncredibleBench 3%, 12 samples1x
SSD
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples313x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples64x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples49x
RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples120x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples76x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples72x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback