HP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA9
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 66.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 311
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 943
88% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 18
Parallax 13.3
10% 14.3 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 14.5
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA256TFK-1BC1AABHA 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSV040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 346 199 183 120 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 1,282
Mixed 929
SusWrite 235
191% 847 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 52.8
188% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 137
163% 297 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 127%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback