TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI H81M-E33 V2 (MS-7846)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E33 V2 (MS-7846)  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 22:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 163
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 293
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 61.2%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7817) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.2%
 Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 76 73 70 73 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 217
Write 54.9
Mixed 108
SusWrite 75.6
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 13.7
69% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 28.6
57% 114 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 40.8%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 31.3%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-E33 V2 (MS-7846) Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 V2 (MS-7846)

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples7x
Core i3-4130Intel  $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples7x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples6x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples5x
SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples4x
320 Series 160GBIntel  $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples3x
Green 120GB (2016)WD  $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples3x
RAM
ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 1,015 samples6x
M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 46%, 39 samples3x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback