Csl-computer 908

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Csl-computer 908 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1228 x 684 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220224
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '22 at 21:41
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 179 64% 114 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 239 30% 231 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.9% Poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 113 Parallax 75.6 0% 63 fps	MRender 92.8 Gravity 90.6 Splatting 76.4 70% 86.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 59GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 280 275 221 202 197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 333 Write 309 Mixed 315 SusWrite 231 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 29.1 106% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 324 234% 300 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 80 80 79 45 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43% Average	Read 74.3 Write 102 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 75.2 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB 7,168 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 908 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Csl-computer 908

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	7x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	2x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
DDR4 3200 1x8GBAdataBench 47%, 7,168 samples	2x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GBTeamBench 48%, 1,790 samples	1x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $127

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16