Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 04:17
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 174
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 454
42% 353 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.7
0% 3.23 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 3%
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 51.1
Parallax 64.4
36% 53 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 39.8
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WPB1 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.1 84 108 37 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 347
Write 291
Mixed 279
SusWrite 42.9
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 15.7
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 0.4
41% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 83%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
230GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 97 97 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 113
Write 97.7
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 97.9
126% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
170% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52%
Great: 65%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 112
132% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback