Samsung 955XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 955XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP955XED-KA1SE
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220525
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 47.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 296
85% 167 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 804
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 26
17% 24.6 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 19.4
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7EK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2583 2485 2255 2316 765 759 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,620
Write 2,338
Mixed 2,760
SusWrite 1,860
539% 2,395 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 79
283% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 912
668% 875 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 344%
Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 39.4
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 19.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 955XED Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 955XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback