Samsung 955XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 82% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 955XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP955XED-KA1SE
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 10:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 82%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 61.9
1-Core 186
2-Core 327
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 828
84% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,140
70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 25.3
18% 24.7 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 19.9
19% 24 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7EK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1881 984 944 1017 1027 1010 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 2,738
Mixed 2,674
SusWrite 1,144
510% 2264 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 94.6
305% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 930
703% 952 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 308%
Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 52.1
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 22.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 136%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 955XED Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 955XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback