Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory68.6 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 10:05
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 578
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 1,233
76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6606) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 128
Parallax 286
105% 181 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 142
Splatting 196
153% 186 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
84GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 165 168 153 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 191
Write 180
Mixed 180
SusWrite 159
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 26.2
80% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 44.4
35% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 45%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 164 168 158 157 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.5% Average
Read 198
Write 182
Mixed 179
SusWrite 159
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 21.5
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 36.8
30% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 133%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
62GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 120 75 155 153 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 201
Write 178
Mixed 153
SusWrite 136
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 16.5
57% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 20.3
21% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
773GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 98 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 85.3
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 100
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 80GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 19
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback