Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 530
50% 416 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.67
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 36.4
31% 38.4 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 38.9
34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 1849 1841 1904 1949 1958 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,008
Write 2,056
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,880
439% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 58.7
186% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 642
486% 658 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 283%
Great: 623%
Micron 1100 SATA 512GB
412GB free
Firmware: M0DL003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 440 416 428 429 418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 368
Write 428
Mixed 360
SusWrite 428
90% 396 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 32.8
110% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 316
237% 316 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 100%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 87 81 89 88 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 149
Write 132
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 83
146% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60ZF5A0 1TB
294GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.1 1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 141
Write 134
Mixed 106
SusWrite 0.9
120% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
300GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 86 80 88 88 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 76.1
Write 87.6
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 82.1
100% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 37%
WDC WD15 EADS-00R6B0 1.5TB
183GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 351
Write 12.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 0.5
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback