Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POSITIVO MASTER C6400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-RIH670EU
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12500T 894 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 15.5 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 179 46% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 540 52% 430 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 96%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CL4-8D512 512GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 448GB free (System drive) Firmware: EV20902 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 706 652 657 657 680 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 986 Write 687 Mixed 591 SusWrite 676 164% 735 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 15.5 81% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 1,052 DQ Write 555 DQ Mixed 483 444% 696 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 242%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD4S3200316G22-BHYD 1x16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 3.9 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 355 11% 355 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16