Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Acer Predator GX-792 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Viper2_KLS
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180926
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '22 at 15:16
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 170 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 481 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 95% Acer(1025 1146) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 135 Parallax 118 93% 122 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 120 Splatting 111 93% 114 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 19,151 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,144 Write 387 Mixed 629 158% 720 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 39.5 119% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 687 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 430 352% 510 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 207%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 64GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 105 106 98 70 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 118 Write 98.6 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 97.7 63% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 868GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 96 91 80 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 65.1 Write 86.2 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 85.3 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 174% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB 1,106 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 268GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 96 99 71 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 59 Write 77.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 78.2 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 134GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 115 119 96 94 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 78.3 Write 88.8 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 101 54% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 68%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 152GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 113 114 113 118 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 85.3 Write 102 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 114 130% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 60%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 37.1 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 38.9 51% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 22%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4GB free, PID 00ed Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 29 0 0.6 33 32 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 220 Write 21.9 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 18.4 59% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 6,230 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23.8 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 21.4 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	117x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	169x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	33x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	31x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	19x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	32x
ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 566 samples	18x
ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 762 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16