Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 11:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 45.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 123
44% 78 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 194
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.9% Good
Lighting 84.6
Reflection 85
Parallax 73.4
69% 81 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 337 365 408 403 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 394
Write 338
Mixed 207
SusWrite 362
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 32.9
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 252
193% 262 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MD-8 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback