Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 330
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 953
98% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 216
Parallax 205
184% 216 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD001T 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1668 1690 1701 1071 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,966
Write 1,726
Mixed 1391
SusWrite 1,081
345% 1,541 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 67
233% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 962
714% 933 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 258%
Great: 319%
S405S240G 240GB
47GB free
Firmware: V2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 160 108 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 475
Write 387
Mixed 314
SusWrite 140
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 12.9
98% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 18.1
48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.2
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback