Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 23:51
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,015
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 208
Parallax 245
181% 225 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 222
Splatting 153
170% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 804 936 934 899 897 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1837
Write 1,636
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 870
323% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 59.4
198% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 797
611% 830 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 226%
Great: 251%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: APGNTD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 200 205 220 216 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 192
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 210
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.9
251% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST6000NM0115-1YZ110 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 192 195 195 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 123%
Seagate ST6000NM0115-1YZ110 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 198 200 201 201 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 123%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 3.5 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 273
Write 27.4
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 2.8
96% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 62%
ST6000NM 0115-1YZ110 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 222
Write 184
Mixed 117
SusWrite 45.5
176% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.4
464% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 1.6
464% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 115%
ST6000NM 0115-1YZ110 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 215 216 215 217 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 199
Mixed 117
SusWrite 214
248% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.3
471% 5.03 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
543% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%
TOSHIBA MG04ACA400NY 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 218
Write 44.4
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 45.6
95% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 30.6
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 29.6
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,042
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback