Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory114.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 247
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 988
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 2,661
165% 2,661 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 163
Parallax 161
124% 159 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 159
Splatting 122
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,684
Write 4,136
Mixed 3,054
741% 3,291 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.5
264% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 797
598% 804 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 614%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
882GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 383
Write 351
Mixed 340
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 183
143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
186GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,335
Write 1078
Mixed 876
312% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 61.9
212% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 757
576% 783 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 354%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
367GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 31.8
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: GX2M
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 169
Mixed 82
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
249% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 131%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 144
Mixed 61.8
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.4
Write 3.2
Mixed 7.7
14% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 36.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 33.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback