Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory118.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 950
85% 717 Pts
64-Core 2563
159% 2563 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 162
Parallax 157
119% 155 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 159
Splatting 120
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,046
Write 3,437
Mixed 2,270
583% 2,584 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 51.1
159% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 870
616% 789 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 614%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
882GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 229
Write 311
Mixed 276
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 17.3
71% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 39
46% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
187GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,876
Write 1,149
Mixed 771
278% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 59.8
190% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 758
552% 727 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 354%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
367GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.6
Write 107
Mixed 34
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: GX2M
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 168
Mixed 79.9
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 131%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.5
Write 142
Mixed 65.9
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.7
14% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 35.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 30
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback