Fujitsu FMVA0400L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVA0400L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26D
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MDG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 48.5
1-Core 78
2-Core 60.8
41% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 146
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 53.9
3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.6
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 36 133 69 106 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 456
Write 414
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 141
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 92%
External USB3.0 500GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 68 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 60.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 66.3
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVA0400L Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA0400L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback