Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 118
2-Core 215
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 577
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1277
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 63.5
49% 65.1 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 63.1
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 73 28 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 459
Write 306
Mixed 328
SusWrite 56.3
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 29.3
108% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 184
162% 241 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
252GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 84 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 138
Write 118
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 86.6
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 20.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback