Dell Precision 5550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 5550  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 007N9K
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400H
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 108
48% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 272
28% 227 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 097E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 7.6
6% 25.5 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36308029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 550 797 864 679 876 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 914
Mixed 1148
SusWrite 768
246% 1,103 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 20.1
81% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 38
DQ Mixed 73.4
76% 132 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 416%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 5550 Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 5550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback