Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 42.3 1-Core 21.7 2-Core 33.9 23% 32.6 Pts	4-Core 73.9 8-Core 78.9 10% 76.4 Pts	64-Core 77.8 5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 78 77 100 102 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 135 Write 103 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 91.7 67% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	3x

SSD
MX100 128GBCrucial $74Bench 76%, 9,892 samples	1x
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	1x

RAM
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1x4GBCrucialBench 28%, 1,892 samples	2x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GBCrucialBench 27%, 1,234 samples	1x

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $74

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16