Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory67.6 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 15:23
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 519
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6606) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 124
Parallax 292
107% 182 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 142
Splatting 194
153% 187 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
175GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 199
Write 200
Mixed 195
SusWrite 150
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 30.2
91% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 49.6
40% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 153 154 153 154 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 212
Write 198
Mixed 193
SusWrite 148
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 24.8
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 39.9
34% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 133%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
62GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 140 111 100 151 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 214
Write 202
Mixed 161
SusWrite 133
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 18
64% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 21.8
23% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
821GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 97 97 99 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 96.3
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 95.1
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 101%
Lacie 2Big Quadra v3 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 24 24 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 80GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback