HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 05:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 149
57% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 261
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.3
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61L3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 97 100 68 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 294
Mixed 286
SusWrite 101
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 28.8
113% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 194
169% 249 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
883GB free
Firmware: JP4ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 128 129 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback