HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 07:30
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 391
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.1
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61L3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 99 155 47 58 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 448
Write 148
Mixed 318
SusWrite 132
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 34.6
137% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 182
160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JP4ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 132 131 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 132
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.8
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback