PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Kamloops Energy (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DQ67SW |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120210 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 13 '22 at 20:30 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
52.6%
Above average
|
55% 84.1 Pts
|
20% 155 Pts
|
10% 169 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
26% 32.1 fps
|
24% 30.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 423 442 455 439 438 MB/s
|
88%
Excellent
|
100% 445 MB/s
|
112% 36.8 MB/s
|
152% 201 MB/s
|
![]() WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 141 140 143 140 141 MB/s
|
81.5%
Excellent
|
88% 121 MB/s
|
194% 1.5 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
44.2%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40% | 12% | 81 | 277 | 129 | 60 | 72.3" | 1280 720 | GSM0001 LG TV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 1x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples | 3x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $426 |