Kamloops Energy

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemKamloops Energy  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 20:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 93.5
55% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 169
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 31.8
26% 32.1 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 33
Splatting 22.7
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 423 442 455 439 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 477
Write 453
Mixed 436
SusWrite 413
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 34.3
112% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
152% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88%
Great: 133%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 141 140 143 140 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 62
SusWrite 136
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G CT51264BD1339.M16F CT25664BA1339.M8FR Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 7R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 12% 81 277 129 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical Energy Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Kamloops Energy

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback