Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Acer Predator PH317-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienna_KLS
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181102
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '22 at 18:06
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 176 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 427 47% 371 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1208) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 6.9 5% 27.9 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 999 956 926 971 996 961 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,597 Write 950 Mixed 1,125 SusWrite 968 259% 1,160 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 30.8 110% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 472 DQ Write 67.8 DQ Mixed 150 140% 230 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 410%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 376GB free Firmware: UH4504RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 192 201 197 189 201 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 375 Write 295 Mixed 246 SusWrite 207 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 9.1 39% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 64.1 DQ Mixed 33.2 40% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FN 2x8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.6% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	849x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	237x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	554x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	335x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	196x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	224x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	171x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	109x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	120x
ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,694 samples	92x
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,593 samples	88x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16