Positivo A14CR6A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo A14CR6A  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A14CR6A
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 17:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 136
54% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 166
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 256 269 268 270 269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 473
Mixed 357
SusWrite 278
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 48.4
163% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 230
208% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 0194 SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A14CR6A Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A14CR6A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback