Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 16:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 156
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 263
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 63.3
51% 65.2 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 55
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.30.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 393 402 435 435 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 411
Write 405
Mixed 338
SusWrite 384
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 15.8
93% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 25.4
68% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback