Mousecomputer P67A-S40 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMousecomputer P67A-S40 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer P67A-S40(MS-7673)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 02:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 118
58% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 194
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.4
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HMSM064G-20 64GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Ver 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 77 75 62 66 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 20% Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-S40 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Mousecomputer P67A-S40 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback