Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160929
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '22 at 22:56
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 91.9 45% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 136 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPC0T12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 368 291 154 154 152 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 407 Write 455 Mixed 356 SusWrite 252 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 29.4 99% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 274 195% 248 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16