Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180221
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '22 at 21:31
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 450 User benchmarks, average bench 75% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 70.3 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 181 65% 115 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 333 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 37.5 28% 37.7 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 27.4 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gloway FER120GS3-S7 120GB 440 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 472 Write 377 Mixed 6 62% 285 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.2 27% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 94%
P3-512 512GB 2,855 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 267GB free Firmware: T0724A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 349 343 394 400 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 448 Write 386 Mixed 342 SusWrite 372 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 27.7 124% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 42.2 82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 104%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 66GB free Firmware: CP100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 50 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 29.1 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 50.5 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D4U2133M/8G 2x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.6% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 19.7 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 17.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,186x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	572x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	73x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	380x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	728x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	96x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16