Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '22 at 15:56
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 202 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 504 57% 448 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.6% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 69 52% 67.5 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 58.3 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CX2-8B256 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 150% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4880303 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 287 293 271 292 269 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 1026 Write 632 Mixed 462 SusWrite 288 133% 602 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 31.7 108% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 611 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 416 325% 454 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 178%
T-force 500GB 500GB 6,415 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 202GB free Firmware: 02K0S6OA SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 344 357 387 375 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 407 Write 373 Mixed 330 SusWrite 358 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 33.2 106% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 118 146% 259 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 126%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 805GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 147 140 143 142 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 172 Write 182 Mixed 35 SusWrite 142 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 23.4 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 19.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	62x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	103x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	46x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $670

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16