Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 05:15
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 134
55% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 207
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7
0% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 10.2
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 42 47 48 34 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 98.4
Write 107
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 44.8
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV IM48GU88N26-GIIHA0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback